<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tim o'brien photos &#187; DRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timobrienphotos.com/tag/drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timobrienphotos.com</link>
	<description>A blind photographer's exploration of his vision through photography and accessibility.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Slashdot &#124; Author&#8217;s Guild Says Kindle&#8217;s Text-To-Speech Software Illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2009/02/slashdot-authors-guild-says-kindles-text-to-speech-software-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2009/02/slashdot-authors-guild-says-kindles-text-to-speech-software-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[large print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rights management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library of congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text to speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text to speech software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timobrienphotos.com/?p=1578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spotted on Slashdot, Author&#8217;s Guild Says Kindle&#8217;s Text-To-Speech Software Illegal. &#8220;The Author&#8217;s Guild claims that the new Kindle&#8217;s text-to-speech software is illegal, stating that &#8220;They don&#8217;t have the right to read a book out loud,&#8221; said Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild. &#8220;That&#8217;s an audio right, which is derivative under copyright law.&#8221; Forget for a moment that text-to-speech doesn&#8217;t copy an existing work. And forget the odd notion that the artificial enunciation of plain text is equivalent to a person&#8217;s nuanced and emotive reading. The Guild&#8217;s claim is that even to read out loud is a production akin to an illegal copy, or a public performance.&#8221; why is there such a conflict between accessibility and copyright? It seems to me the lot of accessibility issues are a side effect of copyright protection. Digital rights management, (DRM), as always impeded the flow of accessible information. The Library of Congress has thousands of volumes of text in audio format, but does not release it digitally because of fears of copyright infringement. Publishers are afraid of accessible electronic books in open formats, such as PDF, for the same reason. The music industry seems ready to abandon DRM. Apple&#8217;s iTunes has begun [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2009/02/slashdot-authors-guild-says-kindles-text-to-speech-software-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DRM, the Public Domain and Accessiblity</title>
		<link>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2008/12/drm-the-public-domain-and-accessiblity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2008/12/drm-the-public-domain-and-accessiblity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[large print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timobrienphotos.com/?p=1221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Blind Flaneur makes an important point in a recent blog post, Preserving the Future’s Creative Raw Material in the Public Domain. These days, authors and musicians protect their work online using Digital Rights Managment (DRM). DRM, however, almost always makes the content being protected inaccessible to the visually impaired. DRM is not inherently designed to block disabled users, but the implementations often effectively cut blind users off. DRM-protected content is restricted to software that can ensure that the content is not used inappropriately. Restricting the file format of the content may not allow blind users to access that content in accessible software. As the Blind Flaneur points out, James Boyle has released his new book The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, both in traditional paper format and as a freely accessible PDF file in the public domain. By not restricting the electronic version of his text, Boyle makes this book easily accessible to blind readers. PDF is not a panacea. Only in the last few years has the tagged PDF format, which is the accessible version of the format, allowing relfowing for natural reading of enlarged text as well as access by screen readers, become available. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timobrienphotos.com/2008/12/drm-the-public-domain-and-accessiblity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

